NEW FEATURE! Special Report: Practice Management Systems
Physicians Practice About UsFor Press For HospitalsFor Advertisers
ArticlesToolsQ&ABuyers Guidecareer
 
 
 
-- Advertisement --

Need More Help?
Ask an Expert.

Business Resources  
Billing & Collections  
Career Development  
Coding  
Finance  
Human Resources  
Legal  
Operations  
Strategy  
Technology  
   
 
   
 
   
      -- Advertisement --
White Papers
 
View All
 
   
-- Advertisement --
Practice management software for medical practices from Sage Software.
   
   

  Try our "Virtual Buyers Guide!"
  -flip through the pages!
  -search by keyword!
  -download to your desktop!
  -forward to a colleague!
       
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
The Law: Trial Lawyers Tell All
They told us what they look for in a juicy malpractice claim. Now we’re telling you.
By Shirley Grace

Why do patients sue?

Because they perceive malpractice, says Manhattan plaintiff’s attorney Jeff Kimmel.

A patient’s perception may be influenced by actual medical facts, but his relationship with you and your staff and how well he thinks you’ve handled a negative medical outcome weighs very heavily in his decision to sue. “Almost everyone says that ‘If the doc had only apologized or been nice to me, or [if] he would’ve come to me,’” the lawsuit could’ve been averted, says Kimmel, a partner in the law firm of Salenger, Sack, Schwartz & Kimmel. “‘But he tried to cover it up, or ignored it, or had been arrogant about it. Now it’s war.’”

Of course, a bad treatment outcome does not usually mean malpractice. People sometimes die during procedures. Complications do occur. Whose fault is it? Sometimes it is the doctor’s; more often, it’s not. That’s why Kimmel and other plaintiff’s lawyers are very selective in the cases they’ll take (and still lose more often than they win, on average). Here’s one of their secrets: They’re not looking merely for cases of physician error; they’re also looking for unsympathetic defendants — for physicians who seem unfeeling. Take steps now to protect yourself. Here’s how, straight from the ones on the other side of the courtroom.

What makes a good case?

For trial lawyers, establishing the facts is the first important step. What exactly happened? When did it happen? Who was involved? Where does it leave the patient? This is very specific evidence, but it must be in place to support the claim, says Kimmel, either “in the records or strikingly omitted from the records.” Kenneth Levine, a 20-year veteran plaintiff’s attorney based in Boston, says, “lawyer’s opinions don’t matter as much as it might seem.”

So, the documentation in a patient’s chart — or lack thereof — is of supreme interest to a trial attorney. So is the damage, which must be life altering and severe. A scar that turned out a half-inch longer than expected? Un-uh. Loss of brain function? Bingo. Continued...
 
 
To view the rest of this article, please answer the questions below.
 
Please take a moment to tell us a little about yourself. It's free and doing so gives you complete access to our website, including all Articles, Q&A, and Tools!
Primary Office Zip Code: *  
Job Title: *  
Specialty: *  
   
* all fields required
 
   
We'll ask for this information only once, so we can gauge who our users are and what tools and information they need. It cannot be traced to you, nor will it be used for sales purposes.
 
     
 
Home | Contact Us | Site Map | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Change Zip Code
CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Psychiatric Times
 SearchMedica

Copyright © 2008 CMPMedica LLC, a United Business Media company.