NEW FEATURE! Special Reports: ,
Business Resources
by Category






Try our "Virtual Buyers Guide!"
-flip through the pages!
-search by keyword!
-download to your desktop!
-forward to a colleague!
< Home  < Articles  < Article Details

 
 
Human Resources: Sizing ’Em Up
Staff evaluations are unpleasant but necessary managerial tools. Here’s how to do them right.
By Bob Keaveney

“There are certainly a lot of practices that don’t do them, but that tends to have a negative impact on the practice,” says Hertz. To achieve their goals, practices need to set clear expectations for employee performance and hold staff accountable to those standards.

And employees (the ones worth keeping, anyway) want direction and feedback.

“As an employee, I want clear direction of what’s expected of me, I want to know how I’m doing, and if I need improvement, I want someone to tell me and help me through that process,” says Hertz. “And finally, if I’m doing a good job and making a contribution to the practice, I want to know that, too. That’s very important to my level of job satisfaction.” And happy employees perform better.

Several department managers report to Needham, and he says he’s amazed at how often those managers fail to confront employees who do something wrong, even when they do it repeatedly.

“People just don’t like conflict,” Needham says. “I’ll have a manager in my office yelling about this employee or that one, ‘I can’t believe they did that! I want to kill them!’ And then I’ll talk to the employee about it — I’ll say, ‘So, did you talk to so-and-so?’ And they’ll say, ‘Oh yeah, we talked. It went fine.’ They have no idea.”

That may be one reason employees are prone to overrate themselves; they figure no news is good news, so when nobody corrects them, they assume they’re doing a great job. That, in turn, makes the annual review process for average and below-average employees that much more unpleasant.

And annual reviews should be only one occasion of many during the year in which employees receive feedback about their performance. “That feedback loop is so important,” says Capko. Adds Hertz, “We’ve done a very bad job with an employee if it comes time to terminate them, and they’re surprised. … And really, the whole evaluation process begins when I hire someone.”

Document, document, document

Evaluations are also extremely useful should you decide to terminate an employee. For one thing, it’s only fair that subpar staff members be made aware that you’re unhappy with them and be given an opportunity to improve. And you’ll want documentation should there be legal action.

In most states, employees who are not in unions or operating under an employment contract are considered “at will,” meaning the employer may fire workers for almost any reason or none at all. The exception is discrimination. If an employee can demonstrate that she was fired for some discriminatory reason, you can be in legal trouble.

Documenting her performance — and that of others — is vital in any case in which an employee claims wrongful dismissal. The employee’s attorney will likely subpoena such records to search for evidence of discriminatory patterns or something aberrant concerning only the fired employee. For example, an employee who claims she was fired after her boss made an unwelcome sexual advance might bolster her case by producing glowing evaluations written shortly before her dismissal. In the case of an employee who claims age discrimination by saying that employees over 50 are never promoted, his attorney would want to compare the reviews of older employees with those of younger ones and then determine which ones were promoted.

“The first thing plaintiffs do is subpoena the performance appraisals,” says Neal. “They go right in with a court order and say, ‘OK, we want every performance appraisal in your entire file.’ That’s the first thing they go after.”

Do’s and Don’ts

Neal, author of “The #1 Guide to Performance Appraisals,” has developed a set of guidelines for managers to follow when conducting performance appraisals. He says that employee evaluations should:



Additional Resources
View more articles from the July/August 2006 issue

View more articles related to Human Resources

 
 


 

Home | Contact Us | Subscribe  | Site Map | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Change Zip Code
CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Psychiatric Times
 SearchMedica

Copyright © 2009 CMPMedica LLC, a United Business Media company.

 
 
-- Advertisement --

Need More Help?
Ask an Expert.

What do you think?
Comment now!

In Summary
Employee performance evaluations are a vital tool in managing your practice. But they can also be confrontational and unpleasant. To help make the process more constructive:

  • Require employees to write self-evaluations. This will help you get a clear idea of how your view of an employee’s performance differs from her own.

  • Use employees’ written job descriptions as a basis for your evaluation, and be as specific as possible with both praise and criticism, offering factual examples to underscore key points.

  • Avoid common pitfalls such as inflating the ratings of average and below-average employees to avert confrontation or allowing your personal views to cloud your judgment.

  • When necessary, set explicit performance improvement goals and a target date. Then follow up.

  •