Quantcast
Business Resources
by Category
 Search Entire Site
 Search Buyers Guide
 
 






-- Advertisement --
White Papers



Try our "Virtual Buyers Guide!"
-flip through the pages!
-search by keyword!
-download to your desktop!
-forward to a colleague!
< Home  < Q&A  < Q&A Details

Questions & Answers
 
 
Discovered During Screening (posted 10/1/07)
 
Q: We are a gastroenterology group that schedules many screening colonoscopies. Of course, there is a possibility that a polyp or lesion may be removed at the time of the procedure, if found. We have always been told to bill by the diagnosis or reason for the procedure. An example would be if a patient was scheduled for a screening colonoscopy but a polyp was removed at the procedure, we would then bill the colonoscopy and link it to the diagnosis of a colonic polyp and the secondary diagnosis would be a screening colonoscopy.

Some insurance companies are now telling me that if a patient is scheduled as a screening colonoscopy, then that should always be the primary diagnosis no matter what is found during the procedure. Any additional findings such as the polyp removal would be listed as the secondary diagnosis. Can you please shed some light on this situation? We do not want to have to deal with fraud, but our patients are getting very upset because the insurance companies are stating that we are billing incorrectly.
 
A: This response was provided by Sheri Poe Bernard, of the AAPC:

The answer is found in the ICD-9-CM Official Coding Guidelines for Coding and Reporting, 18.D.5: “Should a condition be discovered during the screening, then the code for the condition may be assigned as an additional diagnosis.” The insurance companies are right: First, report the screening diagnosis. This communicates to the payer that the scope was scheduled. Secondarily, report any findings from the screening, as in the case of polyp. Remember, though, not to report diagnostic and procedural scope codes for the same session. Once a therapeutic measure is taken, the procedure is no longer a “diagnostic” scope, and the appropriate CPT code for the therapy should be selected.
 
Additional Resources
View more questions and answers from the October 2007 issue

View more questions and answers related to Coding
 


 

Home | Contact Us | Subscribe  | Site Map | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Change Zip Code
CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Psychiatric Times
 SearchMedica

 Subscribe to Physicians Practice RSS

Connect with Physicians Practice on

           

Copyright © 2010 UBM Medica LLC,, a United Business Media company.
 
ADDITIONAL ONLINE RESOURCES FROM UBM MEDICA
Featured Resources > Pediatric Asthma > ASCO Conference Report > APA Conference Report > Consumer Healthcare Information > Patient and Caregiver Resource
CancerNetwork > Cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prevention > Podcasts for Oncologists > Cancer Patient Resources > Oncology Areas of Confusion > Oncology News > Cancer Management Handbook > Oncology E-Learning > Oncology Practice Management
Consultant Live > Practical Clinical Advice > Medical Photoclinic > Diagnosing and Treating H1N1 flu (swine flu) > Primary Care Conference Reports > Primary Care CME
Diagnostic Imaging > Medical Imaging News and Features > Medical Imaging and Radiology White Papers > Radiology Conference Reports > Radiology Special Reports > Radiology Careers > Radiology Net Seminars > Imaging Trends and Advances > CT Dose Issues and Articles > Molecular Imaging Articles
Psychiatric Times > Psychiatry Careers > Psychiatric News and Special Reports > Psychiatric Clinical Scales > Psychiatric Times Blog > Psychiatry Career Opportunities > Psychiatry CME > DSM-V
Physicians Practice > Practice Management > Practice Management Webinars > Medical Buyers Guide > Medical Coding > Practice Management Tools > Practice Management Podcasts > Today's Practice - Practice Management Resource
SearchMedica > Professional Medical Search > Medical Search Tips Newsletter > Medical Search News



 
 
Search Q&A