We've noticed that you're using an ad blocker

Our content is brought to you free of charge because of the support of our advertisers. To continue enjoying our content, please turn off your ad blocker.

It's off now Dismiss How do I disable my ad blocker?
❌

How to disable your ad blocker for our site:

Adblock / Adblock Plus
  • Click on the AdBlock / AdBlock Plus icon on the top right of your browser.
  • Click “Don’t run on pages on this domain.” OR “Enabled on this site.”
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
Firefox Tracking Prevention
  • If you are Private Browsing in Firefox, "Tracking Protection" may casue the adblock notice to show. It can be temporarily disabled by clicking the "shield" icon in the address bar.
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
Ghostery
  • Click the Ghostery icon on your browser.
  • In Ghostery versions < 6.0 click “Whitelist site.” in version 6.0 click “Trust site.”
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
uBlock / uBlock Origin
  • Click the uBlock / uBlock Origin icon on your browser.
  • Click the “power” button in the menu that appears to whitelist the current website
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
  • Topics
  • Health IT
  • Careers
  • Law/Malpractice
  • Compensation
  • Staffing
  • Pearls
  • Contribute to Site

Modern Medicine Network
  • Login
  • Register
Skip to main content
Modern Medicine Network
  • Login
  • Register
Menu
User
Home
  • Topics
  • Health IT
  • Careers
  • Law/Malpractice
  • Compensation
  • Staffing
  • Pearls
  • Contribute to Site

SUBSCRIBE: eNewsletter

Medicare Part B Might Pay for Part A Denial Under Proposed Rule

  • Rachel V. Rose, JD, MBA
Apr 4, 2013
  • Denials, Finance, Medical Billing & Collections, Revenue Cycle Management
  • Physicians Practice

On March 13, The CMS released a proposed rule, potentially allowing Medicare to pay for additional hospital inpatient services under Medicare Part B.   Proposed Rule (CMS-1455-P) and the related Administrator’s Ruling (CMS-1455-R) sets forth that, "if the beneficiary is enrolled in Part B, Medicare would pay for all reasonable and necessary Part B hospital inpatient services when a Part A inpatient admission is denied as not reasonable and necessary, instead of just the limited list of Part B inpatient services currently allowed in these circumstances."  The key phrase is "reasonable and necessary" and relates to the medical necessity threshold inherent in Medicare’s reimbursement policy.  Currently, CMS is soliciting comments through May 17, 2013.

From a practical standpoint, what does this mean? A major area of concern, as the American Hospital Association has voiced, is the problem of a recovery auditor’s finding that an inpatient stay was unwarranted, but the medical necessity was not denied; meaning that the treatment was appropriate, but it occurred in an inpatient setting under Medicare Part A, when it should have transpired in an outpatient setting, such as an ambulatory surgery center, under Part B. The problem being that hospitals were not receiving any reimbursement for the treatment given, not even the lesser Part B amount.

With the proposed rule, as long as the treatment is found to be "reasonable and necessary" but merely occurred in the inappropriate setting, hospitals would be reimbursed under the Part B rate. In considering this, CMS also addressed the claims appeals process and the impact on a Medicare beneficiary’s co-payment. Under current policy, a hospital cannot change a patient’s status from inpatient to outpatient, once the patient has been discharged. The proposed policy would still preclude hospitals from changing the beneficiary’s status to outpatient post-discharge; however, "it would be able to bill for all reasonable and necessary services – except those that can only be furnished to an outpatient – on a Part B inpatient claim." Until the proposed rule is finalized, the CMS Administrator’s Ruling authorizes hospitals to receive payment from Medicare for all Part B inpatient services that would have been reasonable and necessary had the beneficiary been treated as an outpatient instead of an inpatient.

This proposed rule is significant and providers need to be aware of the nuances now and be on the look out for the final rule. The impact on the revenue cycle can be significant. Therefore, this is an excellent time for physicians to assess their claims processes, medical necessity requirements, and ways to improve patient quality of care. Doing so can yield positive outcomes across the entire spectrum of care for both the patient and the provider.

  • Medicare

Related Articles

  • 5 Must-see Coding Strategies for your Practice
  • Post ICD-10 Grace Period, Practices Coding Faster
  • 5 Specialties with the Highest Denial Rate in 2016
  • Coding E&M for Preventive Services
  • 9 Tips for Surviving after the ICD-10 Grace Period Ends

Resource Topics rightRail

  • Resource Topics
  • Partner Content
Mobile
Work/Life Balance
Medical Billing & Collections
Coding
HIMSS
Ebook: Improving Your Practice’s Revenue Without Adjusting Your Revenue Cycle Process
Taking an Integrated Data-Driven Approach to Charge Capture
Physician Burnout and the Burden of Documentation
Interface Engines Simplify Interoperability – But Should you Go It Alone?
The impact of patient financial satisfaction on the independent medical practice
Connect with Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
Modern Medicine Network
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Advertiser Terms
  • Privacy statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Editorial & Advertising Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
Modern Medicine Network
© UBM 2018, All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited.