PhysiciansPractice Members: Login | Register

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Career
  • Coding
  • EHR
  • Finance
  • Malpractice
  • Patient Relations
  • Staff
  • Technology
  • Buyers Guide
  • Publication

Home » Publication » Pearls

Physicians Practice.
 

Planning for ICD-10 Conversion

The path to ICD-10 conversion can seem daunting, but don't let that stop you from building a plan now.

By Lucien W. Roberts | January 31, 2012

For medical practices, the path to ICD-10 conversion can seem like climbing to the other side of a very high mountain. While CMS has plied practices with incentives to make the climb, there are also penalties (starting this year) for not meeting conversion milestones. Regardless of your practice objectives, this is a government-mandated program that is unavoidable. Done well, ICD-10 will be time-consuming and costly. Done wrong, ICD-10 could cost your practice much more than it gains in financial incentives for programs like meaningful use, PQRS, and e-prescribing.

However you feel about converting to ICD-10, the deadline is looming. It's time to start thinking about drawing up your plan of action. Here are some statistics to consider:

(MORE: Don't Let 30 Percent of Your Practice Income Get Away (Part I))

• American Association of Professional Coders (AAPC) expects ICD-10 will increase your documentation time by 15 percent.

• Medical Group Management Association estimates it will cost $27,000 to $29,000 per doctor to move to ICD-10.

• Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) collected $934.9 million in FY 2011, a scary increase over the scant $92.3 million they collected in FY 2010. For their efforts, the RACs earned $97.3 million for FY 2011 — think they see ICD-10 as a gold mine? I do.

For the sake of this article, let's assume ICD-10 does arrive on schedule on October 1, 2013. Though I would love to digress — Do we really need four codes for flatulence? — I will instead offer several things you can do to begin your journey toward successful ICD-10 conversion.

1. Pace yourself and your practice.

ICD-10 preparation is a marathon and not a sprint, best digested in smaller bites. We recommend setting incremental goals/tasks (like those suggested below) along a 6-12 month timeline.

2. Take advantage of ICD-10 training programs.

If you have a certified professional coder in your office, have him go through ICD-10 training and certification. Practice management consultant Sue A. Irwin astutely blogged on Physicians Practice's Practice Notes that coders and billers will need to understand anatomy and physiology at a more detailed level.

3. Run a report of your 50 most-frequently used ICD-9 codes.

If this list encompasses less than 80 percent of your claims, expand the list until you hit 80 percent. Now, use a tool such as the AAPC's ICD-10 code translator to determine how many ICD-10 codes are needed to replace your ICD-9 codes. These codes should be your focus. You and your clinical, coding, and billing staff will use these codes as your roadmap; the charge to each of you will be to understand the granularity of the expanded code set.

• An alternative to running the top 50 report would be to use the ICD-9 codes on the back of your face sheet/encounter form. Such an endeavor may be too much to handle initially; for instance, our pediatrician's encounter form contains 273 ICD-9 codes.

• Start with a manageable number (10 codes to 15 codes per week) and expand your effort rather than get overwhelmed by the magnitude of the project.

• You may choose to offer a weekly or biweekly lunch-and-learn in which you educate your staff on anatomy and physiology nuances.

4. Put yourself in the shoes of an ICD code.

Walk through your office. Look at where ICD codes are used and where incremental detail/documentation will be needed.

• You will discover that the ICD transition impacts many more facets of your operations than the 5010 transition or the HIPAA Privacy implementation of 2003. From authorizations to billing, and your documentation to referrals, many processes will be impacted.

• You will want to assess the impact of the ICD transition in each area.

5. Develop a plan of action.

Each affected area should develop a game plan for adjusting work flows, revising forms, etc. It then is helpful to aggregate these plans and look at how each process flows. Make sure that the respective game plans dovetail each other.

6. Communicate/coordinate with EHR vendors.

Some EHR/practice management system vendors may think it's a bit early to discuss their ICD-10 transition plans; I disagree. Your efforts will be for naught if your vendor is not on the same page.

• Ask your vendor for help in understanding any ICD-10-related changes to workflows, and reconcile these changes to your staff's game plans.

• Get something from them in writing with regard to their transition timelines and their plans to educate and test.

• Several vendors use robust clinical databases such as Medcin or SnoMed that should help you with the more granular documentation ICD-10 will require of you.

The other side of the mountain is less than two years away. ICD-10 is the latest in a progression of unfunded mandates, but unlike most of its successors, ICD-10 cannot be bluffed or winged. Nor, I believe, can it be implemented overnight. The time you invest in the next two years to prepare yourself and your staff for the conversion will, looking back in 2014 and beyond, appear to be one of the smartest things you may have ever done.

Lucien W. Roberts, III, MHA, FACMPE, is vice president of Pulse Systems, Inc., and a former practice administrator. For the past 20 years, he has worked in and consulted with physician practices in areas such as compliance, physician compensation, negotiations, strategic planning, and billing/collections. He can be reached at lroberts@pulseinc.com.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Gary Mohr | April 12, 2012 10:10 AM EDT

It's time to just say NO to an out of control federal government. Between ANSI 5010, CLIA, HIPAA, Medicare documentation requirements, maintenance of certification and conversion to ICD-10, I have no time to practice medicine and no time for a family life.
I will not switch to ICD-10 which is not just an unfunded mandate or a cost of doing business. It is a targeted program to drive physicians from private practice. Solo docs are harder to control than a group of docs in an ACO. Don't let them destroy our liberty.
Remember why you went into medicine in the first place: To take care of people.
Not websites and reams of paperwork.

by Dale Mortimer, M.D. | February 02, 2012 10:55 AM EST

2/2/2012 Conversion to ICD-10 completed. Thanks for help with conversion table! Total time to convert: 30 minutes. Cost to me: zero dollars.
Dale Mortimer, M.D.
Psychiatrist
Vancouver, WA

by Lynne Spryszak | January 31, 2012 2:06 PM EST

I would just like to mention that the conversion from ICD-9 to ICD-10-CM/PCS was announced in January of 2009. This provided a 4-year head start for physicians and practices to plan for and adapt to the conversion. Those who have deferred any implementation processes until now have no one to blame but themselves.

ICD-10 has been used for reporting mortality data in the United States since 1999. The United Kingdom, among other developed nations, has been using ICD-10 since the 1990's. Why does this transition pose such a problem for providers in the United States? IS there something different about the diagnoses treated in the United States?

Physician documentation should not take more time than it does now, unless current documentation patterns reflect the use of incomplete diagnostic statements or missing information. Many physicians have fallen into the bad habit of selecting "unspecified"or "NOS" codes to describe their patients' diagnoses, when more specific codes have already been available for years. A classic example is ICD-9 diagnosis code 250.00. Most physicians are surprised to learn that this code represents a patient with uncomplicated diabetes (a stable diabetic without any related problems) - and yet in most practices this code is selected more frequently than the specific diabetic codes already available. Even in ICD-9 there are codes to report diagnoses with greater specificity, so why are physicians so upset about ICD-10?

Most physicians do not do their own coding and billing - and should not - unless they have been trained in the application of coding rules and guidelines. It is not necessary for physicians to learn all the ins-and-outs of coding if they would only apply a few simple guidelines when they are documenting care:

1) Is the condition acute, chronic or both? Define the nature of the condition.
2) Document the "due to": is the patient's condition due to an underlying condition or disorder? If it is, say so: "Chronic gastric ulcer with acute bleeding"
3) Is the condition a complication of something (previous procedure, a device, over/underdosing of medication), for example? Document the cause-effect in the notes so that the Coder can select the most specific code.
4) Coders cannot "assume" anything. If you don't document it, then it can't be coded. From a reporting and reimbursement standpoint, this means that your patient doesn't have it. It's pretty hard to substantiate a higher-level E/M visit reported with non-specific diagnoses codes - this is what auditors are trained to hone in on. If your records show that codes are being assigned based on anything BUT explicit physician documentation, you are setting yourself up for future problems.

More from Sue A. Irwin:

The Right People in the Right Roles Is Key to Your Medical Practice

Improving Business Processes at Your Medical Practice

Today's Medical Practice Cash Flow Tied to Internet

10 Tips to Differentiate Your Medical Practice from the Others

Debate over ICD-10 Future Leaves Medical Practices Struggling in Present

Planning for ICD-10 Conversion

Treat Your Patients Like Customers, or Lose Them

Two Steps to Simplify ICD-10 Transition at Your Medical Practice

New Year Comes with New Challenges in Healthcare Reimbursement

Physician Credentialing: Worth Getting Right to Get Paid

Feds Set Fraud Watch List for Physicians in 2012

It’s Time to Trust Your Trusted Healthcare Vendors, Advisors

Seven Reasons to Be Very Nervous About Your Cash Flow

Do What You Do Best, Outsource the Rest

Don't Let 30 Percent of Your Practice Income Get Away (Part II)

Don't Let 30 Percent of Your Practice Income Get Away (Part I)







Topic Index

Best States to Practice
Career
Coding
EHR
Finance
Jobs
Law & Malpractice
Mobile Health
  Meaningful Use
Patient Relations
Patient Dismissal
RVU/Relative Value Units
Staff Management
Staff Salaries
Technology
All Topics
-- Advertisement--

FixIt

Internal Investigation Tool

 

Documentation Template, Established Patient

 

Documentation Template, General


  • On This Site
  • Most Emailed
  • On This Topic

MostPopular

  • 2012 Staff Salary Survey

    APR 30 2012 READ >>

  • Secrets of Success

    NOV 15 2002 PHYSICIANS PRACTICE READ >>

  • The Best States to Practice: America’s Physician-Friendliest States

    FEB 1 2007 PHYSICIANS PRACTICE READ >>

  • The Future of Healthcare

    APR 1 2010 PHYSICIANS PRACTICE READ >>

  • Medicare's New Annual Wellness Visit

    JAN 12 2011 PHYSICIANS PRACTICE READ >>

MostPopular

  • Managing Patient Flow: Keep the Lines of Communication Open

    APR 25 2012PHYSICIANS PRACTICE READ >>

  • Six Steps to Boost Productivity by 30 Percent at Your Medical Practice

    APR 29 2012 READ >>

  • 2012 Staff Salary Survey

    APR 30 2012 READ >>

  • Medicare's New Annual Wellness Visit

    JAN 12 2011PHYSICIANS PRACTICE READ >>

  • Recognizing Medical Practice Staff

    APR 25 2012PHYSICIANS PRACTICE READ >>

MostPopular

  • Are You in Compliance?

    SEP 1 2004 PHYSICIANS PRACTICE READ >>

  • Do Managerial Roles Pay?

    MAY 15 2002 PHYSICIANS PRACTICE READ >>

  • Is Your Physical Office an Obstacle Course of Liability?

    MAR 8 2011 READ >>


Sponsored Resources

Nuesoft
Benchmarking: How to Make the Best Decisions for Your Practice
 
Meditech
Program Management Office
 
gloStream
How to Evaluate An Electronic Medical Record Solution: A Guide for Physician Practices
 
Pillsbury & Levinson LLP
Will Your Disability Insurance Be There When You Need It? Not Necessarily.
 
ZirMed
Maximizing Medicare Reimbursements with ZirMed’s PQRS Solutions
 
Physicians Financial Partners
Not All Retirement Plans Are Created Equal:
12 Steps to a “Best-in-Class” Program
 
The Doctors Company
Buying Medical Malpractice Insurance:
A Physician's Guide to Selecting a Policy and Evaluating a Carrier
 
NaviNet
Best Practices in EHR Implementations
 
CareCloud
The End of EMR
 
ADP AdvancedMD
Improved practice efficiency leads to better patient care
 
Physicians Briefing Center
Driving efficiency through EHRs
 
Crossroads Hospice
End-of-Life: The Most Difficult of Conversations
 
Emdeon
Patient Billing & Payment: Efficient Technology for Reducing Costs and Accelerating Patient Payments

View All


 

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy