
Hard to Assess Year One of MACRA, Says Expert
Due to the "pick your pace" flexibility for year one of the Medicare Quality Payment Program, one expert says it's hard to evaluate how physicians did.
Welcome to the Physicians Practice Pearls Podcast. In this podcast, we'll aim to bring you some of the most interesting, influential guests in the healthcare industry. If you have any ideas for podcast guests or topics, shoot us an email at
Pam Minichiello, principal consultant at the Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative (MAeHC), returns to the Physicians Practice Pearls podcast to discuss how practices have done in year one of the Medicare Quality Payment Program (QPP) and look ahead to year two.
In working with small and medium-sized practices through her work at MAeHC, Minichiello did see some difficulties in year one and some encouraging signs. "The overall [advancing care information] portion of MIPS and MACRA align with the Meaningful Use objectives they're used to…That hasn't posed a lot of challenges. Where we are seeing the challenges is with quality data," she said. Quality, as she notes, is 60 percent of a physician's MIPS score in year one and similarly high in year two.
For year two (2018), Minichiello said the
Later in the podcast, Minichiello talked about her experience in the field, helping small and medium-sized practices implement the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) initiative. She explained how CPC+ can help practices succeed in MACRA and provided insight on the difficulties of providing care management for patients of a certain age.
Newsletter
Optimize your practice with the Physicians Practice newsletter, offering management pearls, leadership tips, and business strategies tailored for practice administrators and physicians of any specialty.













