• Industry News
  • Law & Malpractice
  • Coding & Documentation
  • Practice Management
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Patient Engagement & Communications
  • Billing & Collections
  • Staffing & Salary

Mandatory Consults - A Problem for Primary Care Physicians?

Article

The hospital I am affiliated with has just instituted a new policy - all patients with septic shock must have a critical care consult ordered. The rationale was improved patient care; early implementation of aggressive intervention; early and appropriate use of central lines; activated Protein C, etc. The objective: decreased morbidity and mortality, and improved patient outcomes. So what’s the problem?

This topic actually has very little to do with me or my practice, but I was at a meeting today in which there was a very animated discussion, and I wanted to share with you.

The hospital I am affiliated with has just instituted a new policy - all patients with septic shock must have a critical care consult ordered. The rationale was improved patient care; early implementation of aggressive intervention; early and appropriate use of central lines; activated Protein C, etc. The objective: decreased morbidity and mortality, and improved patient outcomes.

So what’s the problem? Well, some internists and family medicine physicians take offense at this. Is it implying that they are incompetent? Is this policy, in effect, saying that they are incapable of caring for these patients? Well, maybe it is. But is that necessarily a bad thing? Isn’t that why specialists exist? Medicine is such a broad and quickly growing science that even the best of the best can’t keep up with all the advances. There should be no shame in saying the sickest of the sick need specialists who deal with this all the time.

The other issue was the loss of autonomy of the primary care physician. Does having a critical care consult mean the PCP can’t order what he thinks is best? Not in our institution, it was pointed out. As opposed to other hospitals where the ICU is a closed unit (i.e. the patients are admitted to the intensivist and the PCP has to stay hands-off), in our situation, the consultant is just that - a consultant - and the PCP is still the attending of record. Is this better? In reality, will it make a difference? Will the PCP actually undo what the intensivist has done?

I’m not a general internist, I’m a specialist. I only see people in the hospital if I am asked to do so in consultation. So how do I feel about mandated consults? I think the focus should be what is best for the patient. And if the data shows he’ll do better with a critical care consult, then a critical care consult he should have. Personally, I think if I were a PCP, I’d gladly hand the case over to someone else. I’d be able to see more patients in the office, finish rounds more quickly, and let the intensivist get called at 3 a.m. with the BP of 60. But, maybe that’s just me.
 

Related Videos
The importance of vaccination
The fear of inflation and recession
Protecting your practice
Protecting your home, business while on vacation
Protecting your assets during the 100 deadly days
Payment issues on the horizon
The future of Medicare payments
MGMA comments on automation of prior authorizations
The burden of prior authorizations
Strategies for today's markets
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.