
A review of key 2018 False Claims Act recoveries and developments
A look back at notable U.S. Department of Justice settlements and policy directives to see what lies ahead for 2019.
The
The largest settlements again involved pharmaceutical companies. In October,
Several healthcare providers also agreed to significant settlements.
Numerous other smaller healthcare settlements resolved allegations of kickbacks, up-coding, and medically unnecessary therapies or services. In addition to settlements with corporations and large hospitals or practice groups, the department recovered in excess of $132.5 million from individuals, including a
2018 also saw a few key policy directives. In January, Michael Granston, director of the DOJ’s Civil Fraud Section, issued a memorandum (the Granston Memo) explaining the circumstances in which the DOJ will move to dismiss whistleblower lawsuits under the False Claims Act. The Granston Memo identifies seven factors government attorneys should consider when deciding whether to pursue a case:
- when the complaint lacks merit, either because the claims are factually frivolous or the legal theory is defective,
- when the complaint duplicates a pre-existing government investigation and adds no useful information,
- when the complaint threatens to interfere with the agency’s policies or the administration of federal programs,
- when dismissal is “necessary to protect the department’s litigation prerogatives,”
- when necessary to safeguard classified information or national security,
- when the government’s expected costs are likely to exceed any expected gain, and
- when the complaint would “frustrate the government’s efforts to conduct a proper investigation.”
Shortly after the Granston Memo was issued, former Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand issued a memorandum (the Brand Memo) prohibiting the DOJ from converting agency guidance documents into binding rules. In other words, the department will not use a guidance document to prove a False Claims Act violation. The department may, however, use evidence that a party read a guidance document as proof it knew legal obligations.
In November, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein revised the department’s policy requiring corporations to assist the government in identifying individuals responsible for fraudulent conduct. While resolution of the case against the corporation “should not protect individuals from criminal liability,” investigations should not be delayed solely to allow corporations to gather evidence against individuals. In addition, the department may award credit in civil cases to corporations that identify some wrongdoers, even if the disclosure is not complete.
This revision marks a departure from the prior policy, which prevented a corporation from receiving any cooperation credit until it had provided the department with all relevant information about individual misconduct. The cooperation must still be significant. To earn any reduction in penalties, a company must identify “all wrongdoing by senior officials, including members of senior management or the board of directors.”
The implications of these policy changes are difficult to predict for 2019. It is certainly possible the department’s decreased reliance on agency guidance documents and increased willingness to dismiss whistleblower complaints will result in fewer recoveries. However, it is also possible these moves will increase the department’s ability to focus and litigate more quickly the cases it deems meritorious.
By adopting a more flexible approach to corporate cooperation, it is likely significant corporate investigations will result in quicker settlements. One thing, however, appears certain: Corporations and healthcare providers will continue to provide the largest source of False Claims Act settlements and awards.
Andrew Sparks, JD" target="_blank">Andrew Sparks, JD, practices in the area of litigation with a particular emphasis on healthcare and false claims act matters, government enforcement, white collar criminal defense, internal and government investigations, and complex business disputes. Before joining Dickinson Wright, Andrew worked as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of Kentucky for 15 years, where he was responsible for all matters involving healthcare fraud.
Newsletter
Optimize your practice with the Physicians Practice newsletter, offering management pearls, leadership tips, and business strategies tailored for practice administrators and physicians of any specialty.












