OR WAIT null SECS
Have you heard about that “free” electronic medical records system that your local hospital, government agency, or EMR vendor is offering? Sounds good, right? But be careful. While there are ways to get EMR software for little or no cost, there are still expenses (and sometimes other strings) attached.
Have you ever been offered a pair of “free” tickets in exchange for subscribing to a concert series? Likely, you enjoyed the concert, but the real price tag - the entire series - was quite a bit higher than you initially wanted to pay. In the end, the concert wasn’t free at all, was it?
Something comparable happened to Sumir Saghal, an internist and geriatrician in New York City. Saghal and his two colleagues are among 200 New York physicians with large Medicaid practices who took advantage of a “free” EMR from the city’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Since last December, when Saghal’s Bronx practice starting using the eClinicalWorks software, the internist has surmounted the steepest part of the EMR learning curve, and he’s proud of his now-paperless practice.
An advocate of quality improvement, he’s not concerned about the fact that he has to share his clinical data with the city, which will give him feedback and perhaps issue a public report card on his performance.
But the EMR turned out to be far from free.
Yes, the Department of Health footed the software bill of $12,000 per physician, and it’s even paying for two years of support from eClinicalWorks. But Saghal’s four-physician practice had to pay $4,000 per provider for technical assistance from the city. In addition, the group had to purchase several extra computers, including a server, as well as the services of a technical consultant to install the system.
The hardware bill alone totaled about $45,000. And the grand total invested in the “free” EMR? At least $60,000, Saghal says.
That doesn’t include the costs of lowered productivity (that can last up to six months), as well as ongoing support for the computer system.
So while the initial price of the EMR was considerably lower than what the practice would’ve had to pay on its own, all those necessary accoutrements represent a large investment. Indeed, EMR software represents only 15 percent to 25 percent of the true cost of ownership. “There’s no such thing as free,” says Erica Drazen, a health IT consultant with CSC/First Consulting Group in Boston.
But won’t practices recoup the initial outlay through increased efficiency? Maybe, maybe not. Saghal isn’t completely sure he and his colleagues will, although he’s hoping to get more pay-for-performance payments from health plans.
Perhaps you’re among the many physicians nationwide who are hoping to obtain discounted or free EMRs from the government, insurance companies, hospitals, or commercial vendors. If so, take a deep breath. Every one of these products comes with strings attached, entails major costs, and may or may not suit your practice. So if you see something out there that looks good, look again - hard - before you leap. Here’s how to see your way clearly to the real deal.
Where the deals are
The most likely source of discounted EMRs in the future may be your local hospital. As a result of several government rule changes in the past two years, hospitals are now allowed to give private-practice doctors up to 85 percent of the cost of EMR software and training, while practices must cover the costs of hardware, installation, and technical support. Depending on their interpretation of IRS regulations, hospitals may send 1099 forms, which would require physicians to pay tax on the value of the donations.
Still, the arrangement can be valuable to you in other ways, notes Laura Jantos, a principal with ECG Consulting in Seattle. Hospitals can negotiate hardware discounts, serve as intermediaries with EMR vendors, and, most importantly, help physicians navigate past the inevitable technical bumps and glitches inherent in complex system implementations. But bear these two facts in mind:
A growing number of hospitals are in the early stages of donating EMRs to community doctors, but they’re still very rare, Drazen says. Many hospitals are preoccupied with wiring themselves or rolling out EMRs to their employed physicians, she notes.
Case in point: Community Health Network, a five-hospital system in Indianapolis, is now installing a GE Centricity EMR in the offices of its 175 employed primary-care physicians. But, except for some private practices managed by its management services organization, says Community Health Network’s CEO William Corley, the system won’t donate EMRs to any area doctors until after it installs a new enterprise EMR in its hospitals in 2009. In the interim, he notes, the hospital plans to provide a Centricity “EMR lite” to nonemployed specialists so they can receive lab results and communicate online with the employed doctors.
Similarly, St. Luke’s Health System in Kansas City is rolling out EMRs to its own medical group and offering the RelayHealth secure messaging system to community doctors. Debe Gash, St. Luke’s CIO, sees hospital gifts to private practices as the exception. It’s tough for them to find the money, she says, “given the reimbursement climate and low operating margins.”
But how much will they pay?
Healthcare systems that are donating EMRs often pay the maximum allowable 85 percent of the software cost. But that still leaves a big investment for you.
Consider Memorial Hermann Health Network Providers, an IPA affiliated with Memorial Hermann Hospital in Houston. Using hospital funds, the IPA plans to help up to 1,300 of its member physicians - all of whom have agreed to participate in a “clinical integration program” - to buy the eClinicalWorks EMR. Scott Fenn, CEO of the network, says that 70 doctors are already implementing or using the EMR, and he expects 400 to be up and running within three years.
The IPA, which hosts the program itself and provides technical support, starts with a needs assessment of each practice. While doctors select their own hardware and get discounts through the IPA, they’re told what the minimum computer requirements are. Some practices have felt taken aback by the equipment cost, which averages $5,000-$7,000 for a soloist, Fenn says.
Because the hospital cannot legally pay for ongoing support, the cost is bundled into the monthly fee of $325 per physician, plus $75 for eClinicalWorks’ practice management component, if a practice chooses to include that. So, participating doctors are paying up to $400 a month.
Plastic surgeon William Riley Jr. of Sugar Land, Texas, an EMR adopter, feels that that’s a reasonable charge. And it’s not atypical for hospital-provided EMRs.
The Butler Health System in Butler, Pa., is charging private-practice doctors $500 a month for hosting and supporting an Allscripts EMR. It’s paying 85 percent of the cost for the software, which is also being rolled out to its 30 employed physicians.
The hospital decided to offer only one product because it believed that would be the best way to improve community health, says Mike Bush, Butler’s vice president and chief strategic officer. He also points out that the system wanted to provide an EMR to doctors before one of its competitors did, and that physician job candidates are increasingly demanding that the hospital give them an EMR.
Health plans, like hospitals, are still rather timorous about subsidizing EMRs for doctors. Most of the technology donations from payers have been e-prescribing programs, which promise a faster and surer bang for the payers’ buck via increased generic and in-formulary prescriptions.
Yet there are exceptions. Nine percent of health plans include incentives for EMR adoption in their pay-for-performance programs:
It has also supplied about $1.5 million to EHR of Rhode Island, an organization of 1,100 doctors who have pledged to computerize their practices. Recently, the Blues announced that it would give primary-care physicians who implement EMRs an extra 5 percent raise on top of other fee increases.
Uncle Sam and health technology
The Bush Administration has been promoting health IT since 2004. Its most recent initiative is a three-year pilot program launched by the Department of Health and Human Services. In this demonstration project, 1,200 small- and medium-sized practices in 12 markets will be given incentives for acquiring EMRs. The as-yet-unspecified rewards will be provided for EMR implementation in the first year, for quality reporting in the second year, and for “showing value” from using electronic records in the third year.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is also on the EMR bandwagon. For the past couple of years, CMS has required its quality improvement organizations in every state to help a limited number of small practices choose and acquire EMRs. As a result, hundreds of physicians received free assistance in preparing for the digital leap (but no subsidies). Also, as part of a five-year demonstration project, CMS is signing up 1,200 small- and medium-sized primary-care practices that will receive subsidies for acquiring EMRs and using them to improve quality.
In 2005, CMS released a modified version of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ VistA EMR for use in private practices. Known as VistA Office, the open-source program is being marketed by several small vendors, but up to now has had few takers. Why? Because physicians find it difficult to customize and expensive to support. As a result, this “free” EMR costs as much as a medium-priced commercial product.
Both Republicans and Democrats have lauded the potential benefits of health IT. To date, neither Congress nor any state has approved direct grants to physicians for EMRs. But stay tuned on that one.
EMR, Google style
Besides VistA Office, there are several so-called “free” EMRs available in the commercial space. The most publicized is the product of San Francisco-based Practice Fusion, which will charge you just $50 a month, relying instead on targeted ads to finance its remotely served EMR.
Ryan Howard, CEO of Practice Fusion, says that the ads, provided by Google and other marketers, don’t pop up in the electronic record. “The messaging is non-intrusive, it’s completely private, and doctors don’t have to click on it if they don’t want to.” Howard denies reports that his company is selling de-identified data to payers, researchers, and pharma companies, but adds, “We reserve the right to.” He claims 200 doctors have signed up for the software since it was launched last October.
Certified? Maybe, maybe not
Neither Practice Fusion nor other “on-the-house” EMRs, like that of Amplus - which is supported by drug companies - have been certified by the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology, as all EMRs subsidized by hospitals must be. So it’s difficult to determine how their functionality, security, and interoperability compare with those of CCHIT-certified EMRs.
Meanwhile, a couple of certified EMR makers are putting out stripped-down versions of their products at a reduced price. E-MDs is readying a “lite” version of its CCHIT-certified EMR that will sport a price tag of $2,000 max - much less than the certified version, which goes for about $4,500 per doctor. Physicians will be able to use the Web-based EMR-lite gratis for the first 100 patient visits, using digital “tokens.” You can buy extra tokens up to a maximum of $2,000, after which the program is yours. Or you can get the EMR for free by subscribing to e-MDs’ revenue cycle management (Web-based billing) services.
Spring Medical Systems is selling its SpringCharts Essentials EMR for about $2,500 - half the price of its certified product. To get the full EMR, company president Jack Smyth explains, physicians merely need to pay for an activation key to turn on the other features.
This modular approach makes sense if you’re leery of tackling all of an EMR’s facets at once, says Randall Oates, president of SOAPware, whose company makes one of the more popular low-cost EMRs. “As vendors, we really need to be focused on transition tools,” he says. “This big-bang approach, where you try to put in a centralized, complex system is showing a failure rate of around 30 percent. Our philosophy is to introduce the functionality at the rate a practice can adopt it.”
Ken Terry is a New Jersey-based freelance writer and the author of the book “Rx for Health Care Reform.” He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
This article originally appeared in the June 2008 issue of Physicians Practice.