Banner
  • Industry News
  • Access and Reimbursement
  • Law & Malpractice
  • Coding & Documentation
  • Practice Management
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Patient Engagement & Communications
  • Billing & Collections
  • Staffing & Salary

Transparency in U.S. Healthcare: Has It Gone to the Dogs?

Article

Have you been challenged by such insolent (open-minded?) patients before, who demand cost information on your recommendations?

My adopted son recently was noted to have some ear junk. Nothing that was bothering him, best I could tell - he wasn’t scratching at it, and I don’t think he had a fever - but the doctor nonetheless said, “Let’s get an ear swab.” Then, I was told, with the results we could decide whether he’d need antibiotics.

Given that everything was seemingly well and there was no true clinical emergency, I decided this would be a good opportunity for me to tiptoe across the line.

“How much does an ear swab cost?” I inquired.

“Uh…I’ll have to look it up,” he replied. Shortly thereafter: “$30.” Reluctantly, I agreed to the procedure, unclear in my clinical mind if the benefit outweighed the risk, and admittedly a bit skeptical about the potential fiscal motivations (conscious or otherwise).

My adopted son has some other issues that are of even less clinical concerns, with a diffuse blonde hirsute coat and a wonderfully delicate, almost reclusive disposition. He has struggled with infestations, I must concede, and no amount of special-shampoo baths has eliminated this problem (yet). He’s been treated for worms twice.

He also sits and stares at me a lot. And, he is a decidedly finicky eater.

The medical trials of otherwise healthy Gibson Fine - who, I’m assuming you’ve guessed by now, has four legs and likes to lick himself - have been fascinating to me, as a first-time, adult owner of a dog. Of course, they are distressing, such as when he had a limp for a week that I never figured out.

But, in the spirit of financial decision making and doctor-“patient” relationship, I must concede to eagerly learning quite a bit, and even testing out some of the cost theories that patient-driven healthcare tenets espouse.

I am fortunate that, in my family, I have a bona fide veterinarian, as my sister realized her lifelong dream in May 2010 when she graduated as a DVM. She has done Face Time exams on Gibson as I stood him on my desk, instructing me via telemedicine to articulate the hip joint and test his paws for proprioception with a standard technique. She has also explained to me, multiple times, how persnickety fleas can be.
.
I have sent her some of my blogs, and received this response:

“Interesting that most doctors spend NO time even thinking about money while I spend SO much time discussing it, and absolutely making clinical decisions based on cost.”

At his most recent visit to the local veterinarian, when I mentioned that I’d seen a worm in his poo, I was asked if I’d brought in a sample of stool. I shyly admitted that I hadn’t. The tech proceeded without hesitation. “That’s OK. We’ll give you a plastic bottle and you can bring it in a week or two. We’ll just make it easy on you and charge you now.”

“How much?” I asked, of course.

“$25,” he replied, after going out to the front desk to inquire.

At this point, I gained some confidence. I had read up on worms, on fleas, and was fairly confident in the diagnosis - rice-grain appearance, early-morning prevalence.

“Can’t we just treat?” I asked.

He went and talked to the doctor, who I suppose concurred and provided me with the single pill that I could hide in a piece of cheese. (The pill cost me about $20.) They did ask that I still try to bring in a stool sample if possible, though I didn’t pay in advance.

Imagine this type of scenario in our medical practice. Have you been challenged by such insolent (open-minded?) patients before, who demand cost information on your recommendations? What would your response be?

It certainly didn’t help that, on the morning when I actually did bring in a stool sample with a clearly visible worm, the front office assistant coolly described how “they always come back negative anyway.”

“But, there’s a worm right there!” I exclaimed, pointing dangerously close with an ungloved finger and probably offering a smarmy smile.

“Yeah, well…,” she trailed off.

Oh, and that ear asymptomatic ear swab? That was negative.

The good ol’ test-that-doesn’t-add-to-clinical-decision-making dilemma - beyond the scope of this column.

However, my sister’s ending comment is worth noting:

“Sometimes I wish I were a physician and then I could be happily oblivious. But then I wouldn't get to cuddle adorable puppies all day.”
Find out more about Bryan Fine and our other Practice Notes bloggers.

Related Videos
Physicians Practice | © MJH LifeSciences
The importance of vaccination
The fear of inflation and recession
Protecting your practice
Protecting your home, business while on vacation
Protecting your assets during the 100 deadly days
Payment issues on the horizon
The future of Medicare payments
MGMA comments on automation of prior authorizations
The burden of prior authorizations
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.