What physicians and practice managers need to know.
Revenue cycle management (RCM) describes the part of healthcare administration that focuses on tracking and optimizing revenue collection. While RCM encompasses a number of processes, it is commonly thought of in terms of software systems.
RCM software is big business. One industry observer estimates the RCM software market size to be over $52 billion, expected to grow to $114 billion by 2025.
Revenue cycle management is most commonly seen in the healthcare industry specifically because of the extreme and increasing complexity of healthcare billing and reimbursement.
There are two primary benefits of an effective RCM system.
First, there are significant cost reductions associated with automating and digitizing a practice’s claims, billing, and reimbursement functions. The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) reports that healthcare businesses avoided $122 billion of expenses from strearmlining administrative processes like revenue cycle management in 2020. There are further benefits to exploit as well; for example, CAQH also estimates that another $16 billion in savings could be realized just by fully automating nine common transactions.
A second set of revenue cycle management benefits come from improving revenue collection both from insurance companies and from patients. This responds to the #1 concern identified by hospital administratorsin a comprehensive survey: reimbursement. The best RCM software will minimize claim denials, deliver invoices more quickly for faster turnaround, and provide exception-based reporting when manual intervention is required.
While there are no benchmarks for the benefits of RCM software for individual clinics, data from one laboratory RCM provider suggests that extremely significant revenue increases of 27% to 45% can be achieved.
While RCM software is most commonly thought of as relating to claim submission, insurance denials, and payment collection, administrators can and should expect that an RCM system provides end-to-end management of the patient/revenue process. For example, RCM software should:
Choosing an outsourced RCM system can be a challenge. Once a system is deployed and staff are trained on its use, it can be difficult to decide to change course. This places pressure on administrators to make the right decision the first time.
Unfortunately, it is not always easy to evaluate something as complex as an RCM from demos alone. While imperfect and subject to manipulation, software review sites such as G2 and Capterra can add to the due diligence process, combined with recommendations from similarly-sized comparable providers.
As noted above, industry observers expect the RCM software market - a proxy for use of RCM systems - to continue to grow rapidly, fueled by the significant benefits that these systems bring to physicians, clinics, and hospitals.
It is likely that the benefits of RCM will increase in coming years. As many medical administrators can confirm, the claims reimbursement process tends to increase, rather than decrease, in complexity over time. As payers, including insurance companies, themselves digitize and automate their processes, providers and administrators relying on legacy systems risk being left behind.