• Industry News
  • Law & Malpractice
  • Coding & Documentation
  • Practice Management
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Patient Engagement & Communications
  • Billing & Collections
  • Staffing & Salary

EMRs & Fraud

Article

I am wondering about the hoopla I am hearing about “canned” documentation not being up to par and how carriers might deny service documented on EMRs as not medically necessary.What have you heard?

Question: I am wondering about the hoopla I am hearing about “canned” documentation not being up to par and how carriers might deny service documented on EMRs as not medically necessary.

What have you heard?

Answer: That is what I'm hearing, too.

Creating canned documentation - in which you can’t tell one patient from another - is clearly good for neither patient care nor documentation.

On the other hand, the only reason payers care is because so many practices are charging higher E&Ms thanks to their EMRs.

The bottom line: You should be able to purchase an EMR that produces accurate (not canned) documentation. If that documentation is complete and it supports a higher code, then you should bill for it and appeal it if denied.

It’s a matter of creating good notes, not a matter of all EMRs being insufficient.

Related Videos
The importance of vaccination
The fear of inflation and recession
Protecting your practice
Protecting your home, business while on vacation
Protecting your assets during the 100 deadly days
Payment issues on the horizon
The future of Medicare payments
MGMA comments on automation of prior authorizations
The burden of prior authorizations
Strategies for today's markets
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.