• Industry News
  • Law & Malpractice
  • Coding & Documentation
  • Practice Management
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Patient Engagement & Communications
  • Billing & Collections
  • Staffing & Salary

To Scan or Not

Article

I have an EMR, but still have a lot of paper. Lab results and other information come in on paper. I've thought about scanning these documents and including them in the EMR, but it seems so time-intensive. How can I tell if the effort will pay off?

Question: I have an EMR, but still have a lot of paper. Lab results and other information come in on paper. I've thought about scanning these documents and including them in the EMR, but it seems so time-intensive. How can I tell if the effort will pay off?

Answer: To determine if scanning is a cost-saver, you'll want to compare the price of the system and its administration (that is, what you will have to spend on staff scanning the documents) with the cost of having to maintain a manual filing system. You'll have to estimate the latter cost, but be sure to consider the space that you will save as well as the employees' time.

Further, some practices have found that specific areas in their practice - like the billing office and the scanning of EOBs for submission of secondaries, or the front office scanning patients' insurance cards - has really been cost-effective, but not a whole-practice solution.

Related Videos
The importance of vaccination
The fear of inflation and recession
Protecting your practice
Protecting your home, business while on vacation
Protecting your assets during the 100 deadly days
Payment issues on the horizon
The future of Medicare payments
MGMA comments on automation of prior authorizations
The burden of prior authorizations
Strategies for today's markets
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.