I have an EMR, but still have a lot of paper. Lab results and other information come in on paper. I've thought about scanning these documents and including them in the EMR, but it seems so time-intensive. How can I tell if the effort will pay off?
Question: I have an EMR, but still have a lot of paper. Lab results and other information come in on paper. I've thought about scanning these documents and including them in the EMR, but it seems so time-intensive. How can I tell if the effort will pay off?
Answer: To determine if scanning is a cost-saver, you'll want to compare the price of the system and its administration (that is, what you will have to spend on staff scanning the documents) with the cost of having to maintain a manual filing system. You'll have to estimate the latter cost, but be sure to consider the space that you will save as well as the employees' time.
Further, some practices have found that specific areas in their practice - like the billing office and the scanning of EOBs for submission of secondaries, or the front office scanning patients' insurance cards - has really been cost-effective, but not a whole-practice solution.
Billing Strategies to Beat Staffing Shortages
March 19th 2025Managing payment postings, claims, and denials can feel overwhelming, especially when practices have staffing challenges. Without the right resources, these challenges often lead to delayed revenue, increased denials, and overburdened teams. Explore strategies and solutions to help practices stay on top of their billing workflows and optimize their revenue cycle needs with Veradigm Revenue Cycle Services.