Splitting Overhead
Do you have a “norm” for how multi-physician practices typically split overhead? I know most practices set compensation as the amount docs earn, less overhead. But how do some practices come up with the percentage of overhead for each doc, if some are more or less productive than others?
Question: Do you have a “norm” for how multi-physician practices typically split overhead? I know most practices set compensation as the amount docs earn, less overhead. But how do some practices come up with the percentage of overhead for each doc, if some are more or less productive than others?
Answer: Yes, overhead allocation can be a burden for multi-specialty groups as the primary-care docs generally can’t carry an equal burden of overhead relative to surgical or procedural specialists.
And, yes, compensation and overhead need to be looked at as a whole. There is no norm, per se. It’s more like negotiation for temporary truces that work for each practice.
Considering AI for Your Practice? Uncover Key Takeaways from This Case Study.
March 21st 2025The main goal is to provide decision-makers in healthcare with clear, actionable insights and data. By simplifying complex challenges, we ensure they understand the issues facing the sector, such as healthcare call centers, AI service agents, and front desk staff overload. We equip them with the knowledge needed to navigate these challenges and highlight how AI tools can help overcome them, empowering them to thrive in an evolving healthcare landscape.
Billing Strategies to Beat Staffing Shortages
March 19th 2025Managing payment postings, claims, and denials can feel overwhelming, especially when practices have staffing challenges. Without the right resources, these challenges often lead to delayed revenue, increased denials, and overburdened teams. Explore strategies and solutions to help practices stay on top of their billing workflows and optimize their revenue cycle needs with Veradigm Revenue Cycle Services.
