One scheduling change sharply reduced after-hours EHR work in physician practices
A December JAMA study examines what happens when physicians get built-in time for inbox work.
A new study in
Instead of pushing inbox work into
The results suggest that small scheduling changes can have an outsized impact on physician workload. After-hours and weekend EHR time dropped quickly after protected time was introduced, while productivity took only a modest short-term dip and then stabilized.
A new study suggests that carving out protected time for
The findings come from a study published in
The protected slots were used at physicians’ discretion for tasks such as patient messaging, prior authorizations and prescription refills.
Productivity dipped, then stabilized
Researchers analyzed data from 130 general internal medicine physicians working between November 2021 and June 2024. Eighty-nine physicians practiced in a control network, while 41 participated in the protected-time intervention.
After the new scheduling model launched in November 2022, the intervention group saw an immediate decline of about 13 relative value units (RVUs) per week compared with the control group. Over time, however, RVUs began trending upward again, suggesting the early productivity effect did not worsen.
The control group’s productivity remained largely stable throughout the study period.
Nights and weekends improved quickly
Time-stamped EHR log data showed immediate improvements in work-life boundary erosion:
- After-hours EHR use dropped by nearly 25 minutes per week.
- Non-workday EHR use dropped by nearly 29 minutes per week.
Those reductions persisted through the remainder of the study period.
Patient message volume rose briefly after the intervention began but then declined over time.
Burnout fell sharply at the intervention site
Although burnout was not measured across both networks, a pre- and post-intervention survey conducted at the protected-time practice found that physician burnout fell by 81% after implementation, according to the authors.
The study relied on observational methods and included differences in physician full-time equivalency and practice structure between sites, which may limit how broadly the findings apply.
The authors concluded that reserving dedicated time for asynchronous EHR work may reduce administrative burden without fundamentally undermining revenue — at least in fee-for-service, ambulatory settings similar to those studied.
For practice leaders, the study adds weight to a growing argument that EHR burden is not only a software issue, but also a scheduling and staffing issue. How inbox work is structured inside the clinic may matter just as much as which platform the practice runs.
Not all EHR systems support asynchronous workflows equally — and that gap becomes more visible as practices rethink inbox labor.
Newsletter
Optimize your practice with the Physicians Practice newsletter, offering management pearls, leadership tips, and business strategies tailored for practice administrators and physicians of any specialty.











